Steroids and hall of fame

Membership in the Hall of Fame is the highest honor a player can get, and accordingly so, voting for players should not be taken lightly.

Steroids and hall of fame

Each of these articles typically include some type of fallacy. It is adamant we discover these fallacies as readers because that is how we can separate fact from bias. A Moving Target, by Jose Tijerino contains many common fallacies to help prove his stance on the dilemma.

The author here uses this quote from a famous sports figure to represent that side that supports cheaters. In this next section we notice a slippery slope fallacy. These two acts, although both considered cheating under some standards, are completely different instances.

One is a serious, dangerous act, while flopping is just a simple in game penalty. Later on he drops another slippery slope fallacy. This is yet another inevitable chain reaction that starts with flopping in basketball and amounts to becoming a criminal and landing in prison.

The last fallacy occurs when Jose Tijerino is discussing an oppositions stance on the topic.

Steroids and hall of fame

Finally, the application of the voyant tool allowed me to see one of the largest fallacies of all. This shows to the readers that he looks down upon the steroid users with this negative connotation.

Jose Canseco Twitter Rant — https: Canseco can only gain from PED users to be allowed to enter the Hall of Fame, as he is a known steroid user who wants to be in the Hall of Fame. His bias and motive to lie makes his argument unreliable at best. A bold statement to start off the rants introduces the first fallacy.

An appeal to ignorance is employed here by jumping to a powerful conclusion without backing it up with facts. This is similar to assuming there is a ghost upstairs when a noise is heard in the attic. He also makes another bold statement in the form of an inspirational quote later in this rant.

The next fallacy occurs in the following tweet. The comparison is made between two PED users.

Ken Davidoff

One who is in the Hall of Fame and one who never will be. This is an example of the straw man fallacy. Voyant was employed on this article and it was discovered that the word truth was used an excessive amount of times.

This implies that what he is saying is true and his oppositions opinion is false.Jan 10,  · More to the point, members of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America (BWAA) will either vote based solely on these players’ Hall-of-Fame-worthy stats, or they will factor prevailing suspicions about their use of steroids into their votes.

Joe Morgan wants Hall of Fame voters to just say no to performance-enhancing drugs. The Hall of Fame second baseman, who serves as the Cooperstown shrine’s vice chairman, wrote a letter that was.

A Hall of Fame without either of those two is a Hall of Fame that doesn't tell the full story of the game. The Steroid Era, that's part of it. Maybe that's too bad.

On the blog article, “Hall of Fame Debate – Steroids and Mark McGwire”, which is referencing the Washington Post article “Steroids Scandal on Deck for Baseball Hall Voters” by Dave Sheinin, it discusses about the first time suspected steroid users were eligible for the Hall of Fame such as Mark McGwire and Jose Conseco.

Steroids and hall of fame

Hang with me for one parting thought, so we can clear up this mess and move on to more important issues, like whether bat-flipping should be a misdemeanor or a felony. Eliminate three words from. If you like your trial issues, you'll get 46 more for a total of 50 in all for just $ per issue — a savings of 65% off the cover price!

Plus — receive instant digital access.

Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region